Enlarge / The US Supreme Court building in Washington, DC. (credit: Getty Images | Mike Kline )
On Friday, the Supreme Court heard arguments in two cases that could severely limit the federal government’s ability to set public health policy during the pandemic. At issue is whether existing health and safety authority given to federal agencies by Congress is broad enough to cover the pandemic or whether Our elected representatives needs to step in and explicitly authorize the agencies’ actions.
The arguments occur as the US sees an unprecedented surge in COVID-19 cases . Indeed, two of the state lawyers arguing against these new public health measures were caught up in that surge and had to participate within the hearings remotely.
For and against
Two separate cases are being noticed today, both regarding executive actions taken by the Biden administration. The first case involves a rule, issued by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), covering all health care workers at facilities that accept Medicare and Medicaid. The rule requires these workers to be vaccinated unless they are exempted on medical or religious grounds. The second case involves a vaccine-or-test mandate issued by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA); the mandate would apply to any businesses with 100 or more employees.
Read 8 remaining paragraphs | Comments
